Comments on: Saved Game (a Kindisoft secureSWF Review)

By: Ryan Henson Creighton

Ryan Henson Creighton — Thu, 26 May 2011 13:32:48 +0000

WTF?

By: Marlon Baudet

Marlon Baudet — Thu, 26 May 2011 10:38:46 +0000

Hello Schizo)) I am using SWF Protector 3 and
I did not see decompil which can crack SWF Protector 3

By: New Release: secureSWF v3.4 100% Goodness « Kindisoft Official Blog

New Release: secureSWF v3.4 100% Goodness « Kindisoft Official Blog — Sat, 22 May 2010 13:05:15 +0000

[...] Untold Entertainment [...]

By: schizo

schizo — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:21:12 +0000

Yes it is the best swf obfuscator but I built decryptor for AS3 secured files by Secure SWF.
Please visit http://www.swf-reader.com.

SWF can’t be secured 100% it is open format and always it is possible to hack every protections.

By: John

John — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 03:50:02 +0000

I purchased the Pro version based in large part due to this review! And we got the 25% discount which was cool.

For support they have been very good (although once they never responded to a request but when I asked again they responded the next day.) They have responded with good solid answers and have patched the program a couple of times since I purchased it a few months ago so it seems to be on-going development.

Overall I am very happy with the product and the support! Highly recommended.

By: secureSWF – Blog » Blog Archive » New Release: secureSWF v3.4 100% Goodness

Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:42:54 +0000

[...] Untold Entertainment [...]

By: Ryan

Ryan — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:19:37 +0000

Peter – this is good to know. We don’t use Flex, and we hardly put the software through its paces. It worked on the Flash swfs we tested it with, so we didn’t exhaust its capabilities.

It’s frustrating that the Kindisoft people are giving you poor customer service. Please stop by again if they ever get back, and let us know if they find a solution.

- Ryan

By: Peter Hall

Peter Hall — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:50:32 +0000

We’ve tried to use SecureSWF for a few weeks, unsuccessfully. Renaming breaks Flex Modules and causes Verify errors when the module loads. If we don’t use renaming then the whole code structure is viewable, and our client is really only worried about our approach being visible to competitors, rather than the individual statements.

We’ve contacted Kindisoft about this, through their support system, and received no response. None of their support materials mention any specific considerations that you have to take with Flex, and there is no mention of modules.

By: Ryan

Ryan — Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:00:56 +0000

Thanks for the link, Rasmus!

By: Rasmus Wriedt Larsen

Rasmus Wriedt Larsen — Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:46:57 +0000

Great review, ASgamer actually also did a review of the secure SWF (http://asgamer.com/2009/why-how-to-encrypt-your-flash-swf) – if anyone wants to read more about this :)

By: Ryan

Ryan — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:14:40 +0000

Thanks, Colm. i checked with the FGL guys and the promo is running inside their membership wall on the boards. Am waiting to hear back on whether or not the promo is still running. Stay tuned!

- Ryan

By: jeff

jeff — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:06:37 +0000

I just did a little looking into the version differences and found this chart http://www.kindisoft.com/secureSWF/features-editions.php . The version we were evaluating was the professional edition.

By: Tony Walsh

Tony Walsh — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:05:21 +0000

Thanks for this, Ryan. I am using Amayeta SWF Encrypt 6, and am not able to crank up the encryption settings very high. Looks like more granular and robust control with secureSWF. Which version are you using: Personal Lite, Standard, or Professional?

By: Colm Larkin

Colm Larkin — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:04:24 +0000

That last link to a contest on FGL doesn’t seem to mention any contest. It does have a 25% off coupon for the product though, which is pretty useful.